Quick answer
Two lots of the same model should be compared not by the current bid price, but by an identical structure: document type, the nature and location of the damage, mileage and its reliability, expected logistics, and the total projected cost after repair and clearance. The lot that is cheaper at the start may end up being more expensive overall.
A single comparison structure
| Criterion | What to look at |
|---|---|
| Document | Title type, issuing state, export/registration restrictions |
| Damage | Location, structural points, presence of water/fire |
| Mileage | Reliability, consistency across history reports |
| Completeness | Presence of keys, catalytic converter, electronics |
| Logistics | Distance to the port, carrier availability |
| Total cost | Price + fees + logistics + repair + clearance |
Why not compare by bid price alone
The current bid reflects only one component of the total cost. A lot with a lower price but greater hidden risks or less convenient logistics may end up less favorable than a more expensive lot with a clear history and a short route to the port.
How to use the comparison matrix
Fill in the table for each lot under consideration using the same criteria, and compare the total projected cost rather than individual parameters in isolation. A lot with a slightly higher price but fewer red flags on documents and damage is usually preferable.
Frequently asked questions
Which matters more — mileage or the type of damage?
There is no universal priority; both factors affect the total cost and risks differently depending on the specific lots.
Is it worth choosing the lot with the lowest starting bid?
Not automatically — the decision should be based on the total projected cost, not the starting price.
What if the data for one of the lots is insufficient?
Request additional photos or reports, or exclude the lot from the comparison until full information is available.
Next step
Use this structure together with the decision matrix from the article "How to Choose a Lot on Copart".
